Jorge Luis Borges – Use of Ambiguity

The Art of Being Ambiguous In his collection of short stories, Ficciones, Jorge Luis Borges uses dreams, imagination and fantasy to establish equivocalness in his stories. With the use of juxtaposition and symbols, Borges blends a realm of dreams and imagination into the individuals everyday worldly experiences. Through these devices, Borges commonly blurs the line mingled with aspects of mankind for his characters versus the constructs of his or her mind.By combining the real with the fictitious, Borges incorporates ambiguity into his stories and introduces his readers to brand-new perspectives of world around them. In The South, Borges establishes ambiguity by dropping subtle textual hints that would ultimately lease for the reader to attain vastly different renderations of the same text. If taken at face value, the main character Dahlmann is released from a sanatorium after a earnest head injury.On the train ride back from the sanatorium, Borges hints that Dahlmann period ically transitions into his illusory past of the old South. Even as he enters the cab that would take him to the train put, he admits that reality is partial to symmetries and slight anachronism (175) meaning that his past, although misplaced and irrelevant to modern times, continues to have significance in the present. The reader can argue that Dahlmanns nostalgia induces illusions of the world from a time he remembered and celebrated it.On the train ride back to his ranch, he describes that the car was not the same car that had pulled out of the station the plains and the hours had penetrated and transfigured it (177) and that Dahlmann was traveling not only into the South but into the past (177). Borges uses this description to indicate that Dahlmann transcends into his fantasies of the old South on the train ride home as a result of a longing for the past. However, Borges also hints that Dahlmann might not have left the sanatorium at all, but has truly only conceive of about his release.Some readers find it improbable how Dahlmann is told he is coming right along (175) by the doctors at the sanatorium when only the day before Dahlmann was told that he was on the brink of death from septicemia. For Dahlmann, dying in the sanatorium would be a humiliating ending. When he is informed of his near death experience, Dahlmann felt suddenly self-pitying (175) and broke down crying. Borges points out that Dahlmann aspires to be resembling his ancestors and die heroically in the old Argentinian manner. Because dying in the sanatorium would have een a dismantle for Dahlmann, Borges highlights the possibility that Dahlmann conceive of up a perfect, heroic death in which he would defend the honor of the Old South. This is portrayed when Dahlmann gears up to fight a young thug (179), symbolic of modern Argentina, outside a country store at the end of his journey. When Borges states that it was as the South itself had decided that Dahlmann should accept the cont end (179), he emphasizes how Dahlmann viewed himself as about to fight in the name of the Old South.For this reason, it is arguable that Dahlmann fantasized his whole journey home and his dreams reflect how he desires to die a heroic death in reality. By incorporating these subtle hints throughout The South, Borges establishes ambiguity between whether Dahlmann had actually left the sanatorium or just now dreamed the whole story. Through this ambiguity, Borges allows for readers to form six-fold interpretations to the same story. In The mysterious Miracle, Borges blurs the line between the factual world and what patch ups as a fantasy by introducing the idea of having dreams transcend into reality.The main character Hladik has begun to formulate his own correspond through the inner-workings of his imagination. Aspects of this play mimic Hladiks reality as he reveals in the end that the main character of his play, Jaroslav Kubin, actually dreams up the events that occurred befor e in the story. The play has not taken place it is a circular delirium that Kubin boundlessly experiences and re-experiences (160). As Kubin dreams up the plotline of his story, Hladik constructs and reenacts the plotline of the play in which Kubin is part of through a dream, thus incorporating a dream within a dream.By juxtaposing Hladiks reality and the play he has constructed in his mind, Borges introduces the overarching idea of how the mind constitutes for a different realm in which the dreamers and thinkers can shape, share, and confide in. This idea is again prominent when the bullet that is intend to kill Hladik on the day of his public presentation stops seconds before taking him. Borges states that, in Hladiks mind a year would pass between the browse of the fire and the discharge of the rifle (162) as a result of beau ideal.If taken at face value, theology has intervened as promised in Hladiks dream. If the reader was to interpret this story in this manner, it is cl ear that events from Hladiks dream transform and impact his reality. In which case, Borges clouds the distinction between Hladiks reality and dreams. However, oddly enough, when Hladik requests the assistance of God in a dream the night before, the librarian states I myself have gone blind searching for it God (161), indicating that presence of God is questionable at most.If God is not yet found, He could not have given Hladik the extra year. By incorporating these subtle hints, Borges also allows the reader to interpret that it was solely Hladiks percept of time, rather than the intervention of God, that allowed him another year. By blurring the line between aspects of Hladiks reality versus the constructs of his mind, Borges permits the reader to question the presence of God in Hladiks execution and introduces the idea that time is relative to how an individuals mind perceives it.In the last short story Circular Ruins, Borges again uses dreams to introduce the reader to a new way of perceiving the world. In this story, the protagonist would dream from each one individual part of a boy until he would have finally engineered a son victimization his own imagination. However, the irony lies herein that the creator realizes at the end of the story he too was but appearance, that another man was dreaming him (100). The protagonist was nothing but a dream of another dreamer like his son was the dream of himself.Through The Circular Ruins, Borges asserts that the individuals perception of reality might simply be an elaborate illusion. The protagonist did not realize he himself was a dream until the end of the story when he steps into the flames. Similarly, Borges questions the credibility of the readers own existence. Borges uses the circular ruins where the protagonist dreams his son and where his son might possibly dream his own creation as a symbol to represent the interminable loop of dreams.Additionally, because a circle does not have a definite beginning or end, it signifies the dreams itself have an ambiguous beginning and an indefinite end. In essence, the ambiguity within this story lies in that the reader is left to question the trustworthy dreamer, had there even been an original. The individual is left to ponder whether the circular ruins are to constitute reality or whether the dreamer is simply experiencing a dream within a dream, another popular style of Borges as delineated within The Secret Miracle. Overall, Borges opens up a door of possibilities that lead to a string of unanswerable questions left to the readers interpretation. In general, Borges uses dreams, imagination, and constructs of the mind to brilliantly incorporate ambiguity into his short stories and thereby allow his readers to ponder new thoughts and ideas. In The South, the readers are left to question whether Dahlmanns journey back to the South had actually taken place or whether it was only a dream in which he portrays his desire to want to die a heroic death like his ancestors.Within The Secret Miracle, Borges weaves aspects from Hladiks own imagination into his reality such as the possible presence of God. This in turn allows the reader to question the distinction between factors of Hladiks real world versus that in his mind. Finally, in The Circular Ruins, the ending leaves the reader to question whether dreams constitute a reality of its own or whether these dreams had an original dreamer who was simply dreaming within a dream, a popular motif in other Borges stories.When Borges blurs the line between reality and fiction, he establishes ambiguity and often induces his reader to question the credibility of their own reality. Through this ambiguity, Borges asserts that there is no clear or correct way to understand his short stories and that each story is open to the individuals own interpretation. As a result, the short stories are open to a wide range of interpretations. Through these multiple interpretations, the reader opens him or herself up to new ways of perceiving the world.